Powered by Blogger.

DO YOU WANT MONEY DAILY


EASY TO EARN DAILY 25$ TO 35$.FOR MORE DETAILS
CALL +919487747807

RSS FEED

Total Pageviews

Blog Archive

Showing posts with label Sapphire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sapphire. Show all posts

Monday, 26 December 2011

Review: Sapphire HD 6970 Dual Fan Edition

There are no new GPUs on the immediate horizon, but can Sapphire's Radeon HD 6970 Dual Fan edition make up for that? If you're into some freakish overclocking numbers then maybe it can.

The Cayman XT-based HD 6970 is the company's fastest single-GPU based card out of the box. But what if you want it to go even faster, how do you go about it?

Well, in the case of AMD's biggest board partner, Sapphire, you replace the PCB with your own design, build in improved power components, throw the reference cooler in the bin and replace it with a custom dual-fan design.

Then finally you tweak the twangers off the standard HD 6970's dual BIOS to offer a choice between normal and super-duper, voltage-crazy overclocking. The OC options allow access to higher voltages for the core, faster memory speeds and faster fan speeds.

The resulting HD 6970 Dual Fan Edition offers the choice between using the standard clock speeds (880MHz core, 1,375MHz) or, by flicking a switch, and using Sapphire's own TriXX overclocking utility, which is a good deal faster.

Keep pushing

What's important about this Sapphire HD 6970 is just how much farther can we push the card now that Sapphire has been delving around in it's design.

Out of the box, a standard HD 6970 has clock speeds of 880MHz for the core, while the memory trots along at 1,375MHz (5.5GHz effective), it's fairly speedy and will cope with any modern game with aplomb.

In standard mode with the card's reference voltage of 1.75v we got the Sapphire HD 6970 to run stably at an overclock of 965MHz on the core with the memory running at 1,497MHz (5.9GHz effective), which is pretty impressive.

Although in this mode the TriXX utility only allows a voltage of up to 1.2v. Thankfully through Sapphire's wizardry and the OC switch, we were able to test at 1.2 volts and above.

The secondary BIOS is all about the power tweaking. When the BIOS switch is in the normal mode, the PowerTune technology of the Catalyst Control Centre offers plus or minus 20 per cent. Switching over to the overclocking BIOS, this is boosted up to plus or minus 50 per cent to allow as much power to the card as possible. So needless to say we had to do just that to see what the card was capable of reaching.

The benefit of the additional power is that the clocks are not being throttled back by PowerTune. We managed to get all the benchmark games we used to run stably at 1,032MHz for the core (150MHz overclock) and 1,525MHz on the memory (150MHz for the memory). We managed 1,120MHz for the core and 1,528MHz for the memory, while still being able to boot stably into Windows. It wouldn't run the benchmarks stably but it did give an idea of the cards capabilities.

TechRadar Labs

DirectX 10 1080p gaming performance

Just Cause 2: Frames per second: Higher is better

Standard clock (880Mhz core): 53
Overclocked: (965Mhz core): 55
OC + 50% Power (1,032Mhz core): 61

DirectX 11 1080p gaming performance

DiRT3: Frames per second: Higher is better

Standard clock (880Mhz core): 66
Overclocked: (965Mhz core): 72
OC + 50% Power (1,032Mhz core): 79

DirectX 11 1080p gaming performance

AvP: Frames per second: Higher is better

Standard clock (880Mhz core): 49
Overclocked: (965Mhz core): 52
OC + 50% Power (1,032Mhz core): 60

DirectX 11 1080p gaming performance

Shogun2: Frames per second: Higher is better

Standard clock (880Mhz core): 51
Overclocked: (965Mhz core): 54
OC + 50% Power (1,032Mhz core): 59

So AMD's Cayman XT GPU is capable of impressive overclocking shenanigans then, but the credit must also go to Sapphire's heatsink and dual cooler design. It's amazingly quiet at normal speeds, only becoming noticeable as things get a bit hectic with some serious overclocking.

]]>

Monday, 12 September 2011

Sapphire announces Vapor-X HD 6850

Hong Kong technology company Sapphire has slapped its proprietary Vapor-X technology onto an overclocked AMD Radeon HD 6850 graphics card, according to a release from the company.

The card ships with clock speeds boosted to 800Mhz for the processor, and 1100Mhz for the memory, which Sapphire says gives users "a considerable boost in performance."

To cope with the overclocked clocks, Sapphire has added a Vapor-X cooler to the card. This uses the laws of thermodynamics and evaporation to cool the card with liquid in a sealed chamber.

Sapphire's Vapor-X technology was first introduced in 2007, and we've been rather impressed with it - it seems to actually work.

As well as the dark arts of Vapor-X, Sapphire has included 10-phase power control, black diamond chokes and its TriXX software for overclocking.

To Eyefinity and beyond

On the back of the card lurk the standard double-DVI ports, as well as one HDMI and two mini DisplayPort connectors. If you're lucky enough to have four monitors, these can be connected to the DVI and DisplayPort connectors for eye-popping Eyefinity vision.

It also supports DirectX 11 with hardware features such as an enhanced tessellation unit, HDR texture compression and 3D stereoscopic support.

The Sapphire Vapor-X HD 6850 has a UK release date of September, with its price to be confirmed.



Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Review: Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate

As the name might suggest, this Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate is the direct replacement for the HD 5670 Ultimate. The Sapphire Ultimate graphics card again comes passively cooled and is only a little more expensive than its older brother.

So it's essentially more of the same then? Almost. This updated GPU comes with the AMD Radeon HD 6670, plus 80 extra shaders, a smattering of extra texture units and a small hike in core clock speeds. Other than that, it really is pretty much business as usual between the HD 5670 and the HD 6670.

All that GPU tweakery means you do get some extra performance out of this newer card, though admittedly not much. At most you're looking at 3fps faster across our benchmarking suite, though that can sometimes make the difference between choppy and playable gaming.

That will ring especially true once you knock some of the advanced graphics settings down a notch or two, especially the resource hog that is anti-aliasing.

Again you're looking at fairly playable frame rates in modern games at lower settings, and good performance in older titles such as Far Cry 2 on Max settings.

That does all come at a price, though, and we're not just talking about the money you're paying for this newer card over the old one.

The Turks GPU at the heart of the HD 6670 is clocked faster, with more transistors and a larger die size, and as such draws a good chunk more power than the HD 5670. That doesn't mean it requires anything over and above what the PCI-e bus can deliver in power terms, but this does mean the passive cooling heatsink strapped to the PCB is pushed to its absolute limit.

Under load we regularly recorded the GPU hitting the 100C ceiling, and that's absolutely no good for either the GPU silicon itself or the ambient temperature of whatever chassis you're hoping to drop this card into.

You can, of course, pick up the HD 6670 in vanilla trim with the basic reference active air-cooler, and that won't come with the crazy-high operating temperatures, but then you'll lose on the silence front.

TechRadar Labs

Tech labs

Thermal performance
100% Load: Degrees Centigrade: Lower is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 100
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 80

DirectX 11 tessellation performance (2,560 x 1,600)
Heaven 2.5 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 5.9
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 4.6

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,920 x 1,080)
Shogun 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 16
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 14

Power performance
100% Load Watts: Lower is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 141
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 135

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
DiRT 3 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 24
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 21

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Metro 2033 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 10
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 8

DirectX 10 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Just Cause 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 20
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 18

DirectX 10 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Far Cry 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate: 34
Sapphire HD 5670 Ultimate: 31

Llano partnership

There is one feather in the HD 6670's cap, though, and that involves its happy partnership with the new desktop AMD Llano platform in Hybrid CrossFire mode.

Youget little benefit from pairing the Llano APUs up with anything further up the graphics food chain, but the HD 6670 is the sweet spot in performance terms. With the graphics part of the Llano APU working alongside the HD 6670 you get proper gaming performance, jumping up to over the 30fps mark on modern DX11 games such as DiRT 3.

But if you're looking for a card to power the graphics of your system on its own then the difference between the HD 5670 and this HD 6670 is pretty minimal. The Sapphire HD 6670 Ultimate is an improvement over Sapphire's previous generation, but not by a particularly huge amount.

You're better off picking up one of the more serious contenders, such as the XFX HD 5770, which won't tax your wallet as much as you might think.

]]>

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Review: Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X

As much as we've railed against Nvidia in recent times for confusingly re-branding graphics cards and GPUs with newer series numbers without changing silicon, AMD is not averse to the practice either. The simple fact is there is almost no difference between its HD 6770 Vapor-X and the old school HD 5770.

Nvidia has done this before, re-badging the excellent 8800GTX multiple times, each vaguely dulling that excellence as it emerged. First it became the 9800GTX and then later the GTS 250, with very little modification.

Almost the same has happened here with the HD 6770 coming out with the exact same silicon onboard, in fact AMD almost seemed a little sheepish about the launch of this card and didn't really seem to make any noise about it at all.

Despite the 6-series naming update for the card though vendors don't seem to be asking for any more than the standard new HD 5770s still in the marketplace.

Though realistically it's going to kill any second-hand market of the HD 5770 as most people will automatically assume that the card with the higher number is going to be the faster chip.

If you look at the specs of both the Sapphire HD 6770 and XFX HD 5770 there is almost no difference at all.

They're both running the same Juniper GPU, with the same graphics core configuration. The only slight change on this VaporX version is that the HD 6770 here is running slightly overclocked at 860MHz versus the HD 5770's 850MHz.

TechRadar Labs

TechRadar labs

Thermal performance
100% Load: Degrees Centigrade: Lower is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 64
XFX HD 5770: 73

DirectX 11 tessellation performance (2,560 x 1,600)
Heaven 2.5 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 7.9
XFX HD 5770: 7.9

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,920 x 1,080)
Shogun 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 26
XFX HD 5770: 26

Power performance
100% Load Watts: Lower is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 205
XFX HD 5770: 188

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
DiRT 3 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 40
XFX HD 5770: 40

DirectX 11 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Metro 2033 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 14
XFX HD 5770: 14

DirectX 10 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Just Cause 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 30
XFX HD 5770: 29

DirectX 10 gaming performance (1,680 x 1,050)
Far Cry 2 Frames Per Second: Higher is better
Sapphire HD 6770 Vapor-X: 53
XFX HD 5770: 53

Tiny clocks

In practice that means next to nothing in the benchmarking stakes, although you'd hope the combination of factory overclock and funky, third-party cooler would make for a bit of an overclocking monster.

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be much headroom left in the ageing Juniper core, so there really isn't much more you can get out of this newer card over the older HD 5770.

Compared with the XFX card this is also dual-slot so it's going to hogging a lot more chassis space compared with its compadre. That funky, VaporX cooler though does an impressive job of chilling the chip, dropping the temperature under load from the 73C of the XFX HD 5770 to a far more reasonable 64C.

The upshot of the extra cooling power and extra core clock speed however is a surprisingly large increase in the amount of juice the HD 6770 seems to require to keep running under full load. At 220W it's got a very high power draw.

We'd recommend the single-slot XFX HD 5770 over the HD 6770, but then those cards are going to become more and more scarce. So if there's no HD 5770s available, and you don't fancy going down the second-hand route, then the HD 6770 is a worthy substitute.

]]>

Labels

Design by araba-cı | MoneyGenerator Blogger Template by GosuBlogger