Samsung Announces Galaxy S Advance

by Kristian Vättö on 1/30/2012 5:10:00 PM
Posted in smartphones , Samsung , Samsung Galaxy S Advance

Reports about a new Samsung Galaxy series smart phone have been floating around for a few days now, and today Samsung has finally made it official by announcing the new family member: Galaxy S Advance. It's a 4" higher middle-class model, so it's not competing against Galaxy S II or Galaxy Nexus. Below is a comparison table including the new Galaxy S Advance.

Physical Comparison Apple iPhone 4SSamsung Galaxy S IISamsung Galaxy Nexus (CDMA/LTE)Samsung Galaxy S AdvanceHeight115.2 mm (4.5")125.3 mm (4.93")135.5 mm (5.33")123.2 mm (4.85")Width58.6 mm (2.31")66.1 mm (2.60")67.94 mm (2.67)63.0 mm (2.48)Depth9.3 mm ( 0.37")8.49 mm (0.33")9.47 mm (0.37")9.69 mm (0.38")Weight140 g (4.9 oz)115 g (4.06 oz)150 g (5.3 oz)120 g (4.2 oz)CPUApple A5 @ ~800MHz Dual Core Cortex A91.2 GHz Exynos 4210 Dual Core Cortex A91.2 GHz Dual Core Cortex-A9 OMAP 44601.0 GHz Exynos 4210 Dual Core Cortex-A9 (?)GPUPowerVR SGX 543MP2ARM Mali-400PowerVR SGX 540ARM Mali-400 (?)RAM512MB LPDDR2-8001 GB LPDDR21 GB LPDDR2768 MB LPDDR2NAND16GB, 32GB or 64GB integrated16 GB NAND with up to 32 GB microSD32 GB NAND8/16 GB NANDCamera8 MP with LED Flash + Front Facing Camera8 MP AF/LED flash, 2 MP front facing5 MP with AF/LED Flash, 1080p30 video recording, 1.3 MP front facing5 MP with AF/LED Flash, 720p30 video recording, 1.3 MP front facingScreen3.5" 640 x 960 LED backlit LCD4.27" 800 x 480 SAMOLED+4.65" 1280 x 720 SAMOLED HD4.0" 800 x 480 SAMOLEDBatteryInternal 5.3 WhrRemovable 6.11 WhrRemovable 6.85 WhrRemovable 5.55 Whr

First, let's discuss the SoC. Samsung only lists it as 1GHz dual core processor, so we don't have any concrete specs (hence the question mark). The SoC selection of the Galaxy S lineup is fairly fragmented as well. The original Galaxy S uses 1GHz single-core Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110, Galaxy S Plus uses 1.4GHz single-core Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8255T, and Galaxy S II moved to dual-core with 1.2GHz Samsung Exynos 4210, though there have been reports of TI OMAP 4430 based Galaxy S IIs as well. Then we have T-Mobile version of the S II that uses Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060. Galaxy Nexus is another oddball as it uses TI OMAP 4460. Pretty simple, huh? 

Luckily, the frequency gives us some indication of the core SoC. Snapdragon S3 isn't available at 1.0GHz, so we can rule out Qualcomm. That leaves us with Exynos 4210 and OMAP 4430, of which both are available at 1.0GHz. Given the track record of the Galaxy S series, our guess would be Exynos 4210 as Samsung seems to prefer in-house SoCs. Then again, we may see country specific models utilizing TI's OMAP 4430, in which case the GPU changes to PowerVR SGX 540. Either way, we should be looking at lower performance than what the high-end smart phones provide. 

UPDATE: We have received data that the SoC is actually ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500. This is a rare SoC as it has only been used in HTC Sensation Z710t in the past. Anyway, NovaThor U8500 consists of two Cortex-A9 cores and ARM Mali-400 GPU, so it's very similar to Samsung's Exynos 4210. We are still waiting for official confirmation, though.

Galaxy S Advance has Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) pre-installed, but unfortunately there is no word on Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwhich) support. According to the press release, Galaxy S Advance won't be available in the US; the release will happen gradually in Russia, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia and Latin America, starting in February. No pricing has been released either but we are probably looking at €400-500 (i.e. ~€100 cheaper than the high-end models), although the price will vary depending on taxation and contract. 

Gallery: Samsung Galaxy S Advance

Source: Samsung

Print This Article 14 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Should have been called... by Paulman on Monday, January 30, 2012 Galaxy S Advance... I dub thee, "Galaxy S II Lite".

P.S. Anybody else think of the Game Boy Advance when they saw this news item? :) Paulman Reply 800x480 or 480x800? by uhuznaa on Monday, January 30, 2012 Yeah, doesn't really matter, but please use a common way to put either the width or the height first.

Reading a table with resolutions given as 640 x 960, 800 x 480, 1280x720 and 480x800 somehow hurts. uhuznaa Reply RE: 800x480 or 480x800? by jibberegg on Monday, January 30, 2012 +1 ^This

Some consistency (especially within a single table!) would make me feel 3.14x better about the world. jibberegg Reply RE: 800x480 or 480x800? by Kristian Vättö on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 Oh, sorry about that. Samsung had 480x800 on their site so I just copied it. I've fixed it now :-) Kristian Vättö Reply RE: 800x480 or 480x800? by uhuznaa on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 In the table the iPhone is still the other way round ("640x960").

(This just happens everywhere on Anandtech, it grates every single time...) uhuznaa Reply Sigh by dagamer34 on Monday, January 30, 2012 I really hope having 25 different phone models eventually crashes on OEMs like the complicated stack of cards this strategy is. dagamer34 Reply OMAP-based SII is real by warisz00r on Monday, January 30, 2012 http://10division(dot)com/samsung-galaxy-s2-gt-i9100-vs-gt-i9100g-ultimate-comparison-guide-all-you-need-to-know/

http://www.gsmarena(dot)com/ti_omappowered_samsung... warisz00r Reply RE: OMAP-based SII is real by warisz00r on Monday, January 30, 2012 http://www.gsmarena(dot)com/ti_omappowered_samsung... warisz00r Reply RE: OMAP-based SII is real by jibberegg on Monday, January 30, 2012 You mean http://www.gsmarena.com/ti_omappowered_samsung_gal... ? jibberegg Reply RE: OMAP-based SII is real by warisz00r on Monday, January 30, 2012 yeah. The site won't let me post unmodified links it seems, but clearly now that it is only for the first link. warisz00r Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! Apple Releases OS X 10.7.3, Safari 5.1.3 US Cellular Announces Initial 4G LTE Markets, Devices AMD Radeon HD 7950 Launch Recap Apple Updates Final Cut Pro X, Brings Back Features from Final Cut Pro 7 Firefox 10 Releases Today, Fixes Add-On Compatibility Issues Microsoft Makes Changes to Windows 8's File Management Changes Microsoft Office 15 Reaches Technical Preview Milestone Motorola Announces RAZR XT910 Developer Edition with Unlocked Bootloader Apple Updates AirPort Utility, AirPort Base Station Firmware - Adds iCloud Remote Access Intel Releases Seven Sandy Bridge CPUs Snapdragon S4 “Krait” – MSM8960 GPU Benchmark Surfaces DailyTech Sources: Apple is Building New ARM SoC In-House, Possibly for iPad 3 Facebook $5B IPO Apocalypse Kicks Off 2/1/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Brain Activity Decoded To Produce Words, Could Produce Method of Mind-Reading Whoever Wins, We're Winning Too: ARM Holdings Posts Record Earnings Nikon Launches New Range of Digital Cameras Microsoft Takes a Swipe at Google Privacy With Newspaper Ads Amazon Profit Drops in Q4 2011 Earnings Report Sony Announces Kazuo Hirai as New CEO GeForce GTX 580 Slayer: Radeon HD 7950 is Cheaper, Faster Than Its Foe Former GM Vice Chair Bob Lutz Attacks "Right-Wing Media" Over Negative Volt Coverage Exclusive: Marvell Says it Will Find a Home in Chinese Windows Phones 1/31/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews -- Radeon HD 7950 Edition "Angry Birds" Maker Says Piracy Isn't All Bad, Can Generate Business RIM Escapes to Fantasy World, Imagines Superheroes Will Save It... Literally Google Offers Clarification on Privacy Policy Updates 1.0-liter 3-cylinder EcoBoost Launches with UK Market Ford Focus Twitter @PatrickMoorhead that was seriously hilarious @kiddfroster depends on the CPU but it should issue halts/underclock first @techtow should be fixed now :) AT and Forums back up :) @techtow thank you for the heads up! passed it along to our dev @kyhwana moved to a new host, will give everyone the info on where we ended up when the time is right - still working on migration now :) @Patranus just as an option if users don't have good DNS to begin with :) Main site is back up, restoring forums now Migrating servers & datacenters, you'll see some downtime/hiccups while we bring everything back up. @CDemerjian hahahah leave my big nose alone!  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information